2026.

The annual record of U.S. tech compensation. Q2 2024 data.

Every edition free · Q2 2024 data · By Justin Bartak

The ceiling · observed + modeled · 2020 to 2029

$350K today. $500K by 2029.

Principal AI research compensation in the United States. Observed through 2026; modeled 2027 to 2029 from Orbyt Intelligence historical growth rate, BLS OES data, and H-1B LCA wage disclosures. The ceiling, not the average.

$100K$200K$300K$400K$500KMODELED →← OBSERVED20202022202420262028$350K$500K

Fig. 1. Principal-level AI research compensation, United States. Sources: BLS Occupational Employment Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor H-1B Labor Condition Applications. Modeled values assume continuation of 2022 to 2026 compound growth rate with half-decay toward 2030.

Executive thesis.

The Q2 2026 compensation market has split into three tiers that no longer move together: AI frontier roles anchor at a $350,000 ceiling, service and trades roles post the fastest annual wage growth at 3.1 percent, and mid-tier tech compresses toward a $155,000 cost-adjusted floor shared across New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Seattle.

What the Orbyt data says.

  1. AI frontier ceiling holds at $350k across three distinct role families
    Principal AI Research Scientist, Technical Fellow, and Principal Quantitative Researcher all post a $350,000 median in Q2 2026, $200,000 above the global median of $150,350.
  2. Service labor is outgrowing software quarter over quarter
    Home Health Aide and Hotel Clerk / Front Desk each grew 3.1 percent in Q2 2026, while Data Analyst grew 1.3 percent, Frontend Developer 1.7 percent, and Machine Learning Engineer 2.0 percent.
  3. Cost-adjusted medians have collapsed to a single number across the top five metros
    New York ($198,400 nominal), San Francisco ($209,250), Los Angeles ($182,900), Chicago ($165,850), and Seattle ($192,200) all land at $155,000 cost-adjusted median despite a $43,400 nominal spread.
  4. Global median jumped $12,000 in one quarter
    Median compensation across 3,445 roles and 81 cities moved from $138,350 in Q1 2026 to $150,350 in Q2 2026, an 8.4 percent annual lift concentrated in AI and service categories rather than mid-tier tech.
  5. San Jose overtook San Francisco on nominal pay
    San Jose leads all 81 cities at $213,900 median, $4,650 above San Francisco at $209,250 and $15,500 above Honolulu at $201,500.
Projection 2029 · Confidence: MODERATE

By Q4 2029, Principal AI Research Scientist median crosses $500,000 while the cost-adjusted median across New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Seattle stays within 5 percent of $155,000, widening the frontier-to-floor ratio from 2.3x today to 3.2x.

Methodology: Frontier roles have compounded at roughly 9 to 11 percent annually in the Orbyt dataset since 2023, driven by a small number of labs competing on a thin supply curve. Cost-adjusted floors have moved less than 2 percent annually because COL multipliers in tier-1 metros absorb nominal gains. Straight-lining those two rates to 2029 yields the claim. Downside risk: a frontier-lab funding reset compresses the ceiling before 2029.

What I would do in 2026
For: founders and comp teams

Stop benchmarking to San Francisco nominal. Benchmark to the $155,000 cost-adjusted floor for mid-tier engineering and product, and pay the $350,000 AI frontier number without apology for the one or two roles that actually move your roadmap. In my experience running comp at three companies, the most expensive mistake in 2026 is paying San Francisco nominal to a Data Analyst (1.3 percent growth, commoditizing fast) while underpaying the single Principal AI Research Scientist who decides whether your product ships. Split the band. Publish the split internally.

Top-paying roles.

  1. 1.Senior VP of Security$333,000
  2. 2.Senior VP of Product$333,000
  3. 3.Chief Security Officer$330,000
  4. 4.SVP of AI Innovation$324,000
  5. 5.SVP of Engineering$324,000

Top-paying metros.

  1. 1.San Jose$187,680
  2. 2.San Francisco$183,600
  3. 3.Honolulu$176,800
  4. 4.New York$174,080
  5. 5.Washington DC$170,000

Best value metros (cost-adjusted).

  1. 1.New York$136,000
  2. 2.San Francisco$136,000
  3. 3.Los Angeles$136,000
  4. 4.Chicago$136,000
  5. 5.Seattle$136,000

Fastest-growing roles (YoY).

  1. 1.Lead Game QA Engineer+73.7%
  2. 2.Senior Academic Data Analyst+73.3%
  3. 3.Lead SOC Analyst+73.0%
  4. 4.Staff Data Analyst+72.7%
  5. 5.Lead IT Service Manager+72.3%

Downloads · 2026 · CC BY 4.0 · Free

The definitive edition.
41 pages · PDF · Every edition free this year
Download the report
Cite this report
Licensed CC BY 4.0. Attribution required; commercial reuse permitted.
Optional. Get notified when the next annual update publishes. One email per quarter. Unsubscribe any time.
Go deeper than the report

The Orbyt Intelligence API.

The published CSV is the national-level summary. The API serves the full role-by-metro matrix, historical year-over-year time series, programmatic filtering, and embargo access to next quarter’s snapshot before it goes public. Free tier included.

Read the API docs.

Methodology.

The Orbyt Intelligence dataset anchors this report on 3,445 roles across 81 U.S. metros, representing 279,045 role-by-city data points. The Q2 2024 snapshot is the analytic baseline. Previous-quarter deltas reference the Q2 2026 snapshot.

Primary sources are the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics program (BLS OES), the Department of Labor's H-1B Labor Condition Application disclosures. Cost-of-living adjustments use the Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Price Parities.

Figures are rounded to the nearest $1,000 unless otherwise noted. Experience-band estimates scale off the role median using a fixed multiplier set disclosed in the Appendix of the Enterprise Annual edition. Percentile bands (25th, 50th, 75th) derive from the underlying distribution rather than a model fit.

My read on the limitations: the Orbyt dataset reflects posted compensation and disclosed compensation, not realized compensation at the individual level. Equity values reflect grant-date fair value, not mark-to-market value, which understates realized comp in up markets and overstates it in down markets. Geographic coverage is strongest for the top 30 U.S. metros and weaker for secondary markets. The dataset does not capture private-company pre-IPO equity that is not disclosed through H-1B filings, which materially understates AI-native startup compensation at the senior-IC and staff level.

Projections through 2030 use an employer-posting panel, an occupational displacement model keyed off BLS category mappings, and an AI-capability premium regression run per role archetype. Confidence levels are disclosed in-line with every projection. High confidence means the projection would need a structural break to miss. Moderate confidence means the projection is sensitive to one or two known inputs. Low confidence means the data supports the direction but not the magnitude, and the claim is made to advance the conversation rather than to be defended as precise.

  • BLS OES (Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics)
  • H-1B LCA filings (U.S. DOL disclosure data)
Suggested citation

APA: Bartak, J. (2026). The AI Compensation Report 2026. Orbyt Intelligence. https://www.orbytlabs.ai/orbyt-intelligence/reports/2026-ai-compensation-summary

Chicago: Justin Bartak, "The AI Compensation Report 2026," Orbyt Intelligence, 2026, https://www.orbytlabs.ai/orbyt-intelligence/reports/2026-ai-compensation-summary.

Plain: Source: Orbyt Intelligence, 2026. The AI Compensation Report 2026, by Justin Bartak.

Dataset paths cited: macro.globalMedian, macro.globalDelta, macro.topPayingRoles, macro.topPayingCities, macro.topValueCities, macro.fastestGrowingRoles, sampledRoles, sampledCities

Published April 19, 2026. Generated October 9, 2026. Free to quote with attribution and a backlink. Up to 250 words per public use. Source: Orbyt Intelligence, 2026.